|
| 09/28/2005 |
|
We wish to learn:
![]() |
How life emerged from non-life is an
extremely challenging question. The experiments of Oparin, Miller
and others now lend weight to the hypothesis that energy in the form of
ultraviolet light from the sun, or lightning discharges, could have created
complex organic molecules. Over the immensity of time, cell-like aggregates
of these molecules, called coacervates, somehow gave rise to the first
primitive cells. Major, additional steps are needed - the origin of photosynthesis
and respiration, and the ability to self-replicate. We know little about
these.
Geological evidence suggests that the first cells arose at least 3.5 billion years ago. Fossil remains of 2-billion-year old stromatolies - large structures formed by blue-green algae - demonstrate that much biological activity was taking place then, and probably much earlier. Similar structures can be seen today along the coast of Australia. Geological evidence also tells us that photosynthesis appeared on the scene roughly 2.5 billion years ago. Initially this oxygen was taken up by easily oxidized rocks, producing "banded rock" and "red bed" formations. About 1 billion years ago, oxygen began to accumulate in the atmosphere. This had two important consequences. First, it set the stage for the advent of aerobic (oxygen-based) respiration. Second, as ultraviolet light split oxygen molecules, ozone was formed, resulting in the ozone layer that now serves as a shield against UV light. |
For our purposes it is important
to appreciate that the origin of the eukaryotic cell some 2 billion years
ago was an important evolutionary step. The bacteria are prokaryotes. All
other life forms -- protozoa, fungi, plants and animals -- are eukaryotes.
It is now thought that at least two organelles found only in eukaryotes --
mitochondria (the location of energy transformations) and chloroplasts
(the location of photosynthesis) originated as prokaryotic cells that took
up residence within "hospitable" eukaryote precursors. This endosymbiotic
hypothesis may explain the evolution of more complex cell structures from
simpler cell precursors. Later, the evolution of multicellularity was a
further significant advance toward higher life.
How did Life Arise ?
![]() |
In
the 1950s, Miller and Urey successfully tested Oparin's hypothesis. Using
a simulated "primitive atmosphere" of methane, ammonia, and hydrogen,
and an electric spark, they observed the formation of amino acids in their
apparatus. Further experiments have substituted CO2 for CH4 and NH3, and
ultraviolet light for the electric spark.
|
Major Events in the History of Life
The Precambrian world was relatively
rich in life, but unfortunately we have an extremely poor fossil record
from that ancient time. However, we know that protozoans, fungi, and animals
had evolved - only higher plants and vertebrates had yet to appear. Many invertebrate phyla were
already represented, and all the kingdoms of life existed. Steven Gould, in
The
Burgess Shale, paints an exciting picture of the diversity of life
at the dawn of the Cambrian, and of the "might-have-been's" that never
advanced further, due either to chance or inferior design. This great diversification
roughly 600 million years ago is the "big bang" of animal evolution.
The four eons of earth history. Ga = billion years ago, Ma = million years ago. After Purves et al.
|
| ERA | PERIOD | ONSET | MAJOR EVENTS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paleozoic | Cambrian | 540 Ma | most animal phyla present, diverse algae | |
| Ordovician | 490 Ma | first jawless fishes, animal diversification | ME | |
| Silurian | 445 Ma | first bony fishes, colonization of land | ||
| Devonian | 420 Ma | first insects and amphibians, fish diversify | ME | |
| Carboniferous | 355 Ma | extensive forests, first reptiles, insects radiate | ||
| Permian | 290 Ma | continents aggregate into Pangaea, reptiles radiate, insects are diverse | ME | |
| Mesozoic | Triassic | 250 Ma | continents begin to drift, early dinosaurs, first mammals, marine inverts. diversify | ME |
| Jurassic | 200 Ma | continents drifting, first birds, diverse dinosaurs | ||
| Cretaceous | 145 Ma | most continents widely separated, flowering plants and mammals diversity, dinosaurs continue diversification | ME | |
| Cenozoic | Tertiary | 65 Ma | continents nearing present locations; radiation of mammals, birds, flowering plants, pollinating insects | |
| Quaternary | 2 Ma | repeated glaciations, humans evolve, extinctions of large mammals |
Unfortunately, we do not have time to undertake a detailed examination of this 600 million years of evolutionary diversification and extinction. For our purposes it is helpful to make a few major generalizations:

The K-T extinction marking the end of the Cretaceous and beginning of the Tertiary, some 66 mya, is the best known event to most people. The mass extinction at the end of the Permian is the single largest mass extinction. It is estimated that up to 95% of terrestrial and marine species became extinct during this event.
The K-T extinction has attracted much interest not only because it marks the end of the age of reptiles and the radiation of birds and mammals, but because some remarkable scientific detective work suggests that the cause was the collision of a large meteorite with earth. A thin but abnormally rich band of iridium - a metal common in meteorites but rare in the earth's crust - marks the boundary between Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks. The theory was put forward that a meteorite as large as 10 km in diameter collided with earth at a speed of 72,000 km/hr. This thin layer of iridium found around the world is thought to be the signature of a colossal impact that likely produced an immense dust cloud that cooled the earth, greatly reduced photosynthesis, and created acid rains for a period of years. Fires, tidal waves and volcanic eruptions might have resulted as well. The subsequent discovery off the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, of a crater 180 km in diameter, makes this theory all the more compelling.
Other mass extinctions have not been associated with such a specific and short-term catastrophic event. Instead, climate cooling seems to be the best current explanation for other, more ancient mass extinctions. For example, the Permian extinction coincides with the coalescing of the continents into the super-continent Pangaea. The interior of Pangaea, far from the moderating influence of the oceans, would have experienced harsh, continental climates and massive glaciation.
The Pleistocene extinction also is of great interest. Between 100,000 and 10,000 years ago, depending on location, a large fraction of the world's large mammals went extinct. The loss of the mammalian mega-fauna in North America is particularly spectacular, rapid, and recent. Over at most a few thousand years, coinciding with the retreat of the last (Wisconsin) glaciation, a rich diversity of large mammals went extinct. This event also coincided at least approximately with the arrival of humans in North America. Crossing the Bering Land Bridge from Eurasia, the first humans on this continent spread southward, eventually colonizing the South America as well. In a brief flash of earth history, the mammalian mega-fauna of North America changed dramatically, and it is tempting to ascribe this to human hunters. Human hunting may have caused mega-faunal extinctions in other regions of the world as well. The evidence is still too thin to say: in particular, the timing of human arrival in North America is still uncertain. Possibly climate change and over-hunting acted in combination, and loss of certain (keystone) species set off a chain of events in which further losses took place. On the other hand, glaciers advanced and retreated many times during the Pleistocene - why did the great extinctions occur only with the last period of warming, unless humans played a role?
Every extinction carries within it an opportunity that may work to the advantage of a new species or body plan. Indeed, many extinctions are simply the gradual evolutionary change in which descendent species replace their ancestors because they are better adapted to then-prevailing conditions (see natural selection). A mass extinction is an opportunity for adaptive radiation. Perhaps the most dramatic example is the rise of the mammals. Our ancestors shared the earth with dinosaurs for tens of millions of years. Ancestral mammals were small, undifferentiated scavengers. After the demise of the dinosaurs, within another ten million years all of the major orders of mammals (and of birds as well) had differentiated.
Many observers believe we are now
entering a modern
period of mass extinction. This is a topic which we will revisit during
the second part of this course.
This argument remains unsettled,
in part because imperfections in the fossil record can give the appearance
of alternating periods of stasis and rapid change. Perhaps a more complete
fossil record would support one or the other theory; perhaps evidence exists
for both theories, but is insufficient to help us decide which is more
likely to be correct, and under what circumstances. Regardless, the notion
of a rate of evolution can be quantified, and that it might fluctuate,
are important ideas.
SummarySuggested Readings: